• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Choose which site to search.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Logo University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Arkansas Geriatric Education Collaborative
  • UAMS Health
  • Jobs
  • Giving
  • About Us
    • Director of the UAMS Arkansas Geriatric Education Collaborative
    • Meet the Team
      • AGEC Faculty & Staff
    • AGEC Quarterly Newsletter
    • Our Academic and Community Partners
    • Contact Us
  • Health Professionals/CE
    • Upcoming CE Webinars
      • UAMS Geriatric Project iECHO
      • CE Event: Cannabis Use in Older Adults: Emerging Evidence, Ongoing Questions
    • Watch Previous CE Webinars
    • Alzheimer’s & Other Dementia Education Programs
    • Conferences/Special Events
  • Programs for Older Adults
    • Resources for Older Arkansans
    • Online Community Programs
    • Dementia Programs for Family Caregivers
    • Mind and Body Programs
    • Healthy Lifestyle, Disease Management for Older Adults (Seniors)
  • Popular Resources: Caregiver Toolkit
    • Popular Resources
    • Caregiver Tip Cards
    • Caregiver Resources Available in Spanish
    • Recursos en español Para Cuidadores
    • Senior Medicare Patrol (SMP)
  • NEW Become a Dementia Friend
  • Calendar
  1. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
  2. Arkansas Geriatric Education Collaborative
  3. AGEC
  4. Page 10

AGEC

Director of the UAMS Arkansas Geriatric Education Collaborative

RM

Robin McAtee, Ph.D. is an assistant professor and director of the Arkansas Geriatric Education Collaborative in the UAMS College of Medicine Department of Geriatrics.
Dr. Robin McAtee is the Primary Investigator and Project Director of the UAMS Arkansas Geriatric Education Collaborative, a Geriatric Workforce Enhancement Grant from the Health Resources and Services Administration Health Services.   She has been focused in geriatrics for the past 20 years. She has worked extensively with national foundations and federal agencies to bring in almost $20 M for caregiver and geriatric focused training in Arkansas.

 

Filed Under: AGEC, UAMS

Suicide Prevention in the Older Adult Population

Arkansas State University

By Alex Henry, BS-CD & Hannah Speer, OTD/S
College of Nursing and Health Professions
Arkansas State University

 

Every day 10,000 people turn 65 years old (Heimlich & Heimlich, 2014). Because of this, the elderly adult population is increasing rapidly. Of this elderly population, 40% will need some form of long term care whether it be an assisted living facility or a nursing home (Mezuk, Lohman, Leslie, & Powell, 2015). The rapid growth of this cohort makes one percent of elderly adults who commit suicide extremely alarming (Mills, Gallimore, Watts, & Hemphill, 2016). Adults 65 years and older, specifically men, have a suicide rate of 30 per 100,000 (Mezuk, Lohman, Leslie, & Powell, 2015). Forma et al. (2017) found that of elderly adults who committed suicide, 70% had been admitted to the hospital within the last two years. Of the 70% who committed suicide, 36.8% had been discharged from the hospital within the previous month. There are many factors to consider in looking at suicide in the elderly population. The elements can be as personal as social isolation, feeling like a burden to the family, depression as well as facility issues such as high staff turnover and the number of beds (Mezuk, Lohman, Leslie, & Powell, 2015). This significant number of factors coincides with an alarming rate of suicide in the elderly population. These factors should be taken into consideration by the facility staff both in the hospital and in long term care facilities. Staff, especially nurses, should be educated to identify risk factors of depression and suicide and to monitor the mental health of the patients.

A research study conducted by Mospan, Hess, Blackwelder, Grover, & Dula (2017) recognized the role of the primary care provider in taking properly monitoring patients at risk for suicide. The researchers found that nurses rarely used their knowledge of suicide prevention (p. 537). They suggested an educational intervention which provided a variety of online, live, and asynchronous learning activities (for example) to help bridge the gap. Cheryl et al. (2013) conducted a study involving the competencies for educating advanced practice and general psychiatric mental health nurses. The researchers found that there are no standard competencies for teaching or assessing suicide risk.  However, the American Psychiatric Nurses Association’s position on this topic is that it is the individual nurse’s responsibility to complete research for his or her evidence-based practice to treat patients with mental illness (Cheryl et al., 2013). Based on these studies, student nurses and nurses already in the field should both be able to detect signs of suicide in their elderly patients and to learn about suicide prevention. All facility staff, nurses especially, should take the initiative in developing their skills to understand the risk of suicide in their patients better.

 

 

 

References

Mospan, C., Hess, R., Blackwelder, R., Grover, S., & Dula, C. (2017). A two-year review of suicide ideation assessments among medical, nursing, and pharmacy students. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 31(4), 537-539.  doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1301900

Cheryl, P., Janet, Y., Barbara, L., Pamela, G., Eric, A., & Deborah, H. (2013). Competency-based training for PMH nurse generalists: Inpatient intervention and prevention of suicide. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, (4), 205. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1078390313496275

Heimlich, R., & Heimlich, R. (2014, February 07). Baby boomers retire. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2010/12/29/baby-boomers-retire/

Forma, L., Aaltonen, M., Pulkki, J., Raitanen, J., Rissanen, P., & Jylha, M. (2017). Care service use in 2 years preceding suicide among older adults: Comparison with those who died a natural death and those who lived longer. European Journal of Ageing, 2, 143. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-016-0397-9

Mills, P. D., Gallimore, B. I., Watts, B. V., & Hemphill, R. R. (2016). Suicide attempts and completions in Veterans Affairs nursing home care units and long-term care facilities: a review of root-cause analysis reports. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 31(5), 518. Retrieved from https://ezproxy.library.astate.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=114190206&site=eds-live&scope=site

Mezuk, B., Lohman, M., Leslie, M., & Powell, V. (2015). Suicide risk in nursing homes and assisted living facilities: 2003-2011. American Journal of Public Health, 105(7), 1495–1502. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302573

World Health Organization. (2014). Preventing suicide: A global imperative. Retrieved from https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/131056/9789241564779_eng.pdf;jsessionid=61FB77728ABF43079DC58810EFB7F8B0?sequence=1

Filed Under: AGEC, Arkansas State University

Communicating with patients. What is the best strategy?

UCA logo

By Jacquie Rainey, DrPH, MCHES
College of Health and Behavioral Sciences,
University of Central Arkansas

 

Effective communication with patients is integral to a patient and family-centered approach to care. Effective communication contains elements such as establishing rapport, gaining trust, determining readiness to learn (change), considering the patient’s perspective and asking the right questions. The question is: How we do this in the limited amount of time we have to see a patient? Techniques talked about often involve paying attention to the patient’s concerns, asking them about their motivations, talking about their fears, and listening carefully to their concerns and core beliefs. Two approaches to communication that have gained popularity are motivational interviewing (MI),1 and  health literacy.


Motivational Interviewing

Motivational interviewing is a communication method that can aid in the development of the patient-provider relationship and thus enhance adherence to medical regimens and behavior change, as well as increase patient satisfaction. Motivational interviewing has been defined as “.. a collaborative, person-centered form of guiding to elicit and strengthen motivation for change.” 2

MI has been described as a complex set of client-centered skills of reflective listening and not a technique that can be learned from a few hours of training. It involves the use of specific communication strategies that are designed to get to the heart of a person’s motivation to change. Miller and Rollnick believe that some clinicians may intuitively practice elements of MI. The use of ‘guiding’ someone to a decision when they are dealing with a problem is a mix of asking, listening and providing information. This type of communication is a common practice among many clinicians. However, MI is true reflective listening in the face of ambivalence from the patient or even irrational and contradictory motives. The purpose of MI is to help the patient recognize their own thoughts and goals and facilitate change. It is a true collaboration between the patient and the provider. The provider uses interviewing to draw out the patient’s ideas and motivations rather than telling them what they should do, and thus empowering the individual to take responsibility for their actions. MI has shown to be effective with older adults in influencing change related to weight loss, medication management and exercise.3 Although MI has a lot to offer in effective patient communication, most healthcare providers are not effectively trained in this technique and do not have enough time with the patient to appropriately employ this method.


Health Literacy

Other suggestions for effectively communicating with patients come from the field of Health Literacy. Health Literacy involves communicating with a patient in a manner that ensures the patient understands and is able to utilize the information provided to make an informed decision. Teach back is one technique that requires the healthcare provider to listen to the patient explain their understanding of the desired action or information. If the patient can’t explain the desired action then the provider attempts to convey the message in another way. The Ask Me 3 approach from Health Literacy requires the patient to ask the healthcare provider three questions: What is my main problem? What do I need to do? Why is it important for me to do this? These are all very important questions but they are clinician-centered rather than patient-centered. The questions may lead to more knowledge and understanding but they do not encourage shared decision making and goal setting and thus patient empowerment. 4


Effective Listening

Effective listening is often described as a lost art in medicine. In one study, family practice and internal medicine residents spent an average of 12 seconds letting the patient speak before interrupting them during primary care visits, often interrupting before the patient had finished explaining an issue.5

To be an effective advocate for the patient and partner in their healthcare the provider needs to find out who the patient really is, where they are in their healthcare, and how they want to proceed. Ronald Epstein M.D. discusses healthcare providers being present in the moment when communicating with patients in his book Attending: Medicine, Mindfulness and Humanity. He describes being present as listening deeply, without interruption, judgement or preconceptions..6 The provider needs to learn whether the patient understands the diagnosis and also the patient’s perspective of her health status and options.

Suneel Dhand believes the one question doctors utilize the least is asking the patient, “What are your goals?” This question gets at what the patient would like to see as an outcome of the encounter. It is particularly important to ask this of older adults who may be dealing with multiple health challenges. It elicits the patient’s expectations for their care and shows that the provider cares about them and their health. It engages the patient in their own healthcare and fosters the patient-provider relationship.7

The core element of MI, health literacy and effective patient education/communication is listening. By exploring the patient’s goals and values and determining what they want from their care, the provider can determine if the desired behavior or treatment fits in with the person’s values. Does the behavior change or healthcare plan help to accomplish an important goal or does it interfere with the goal?

Questions that could be used to help elicit goals are:

What specifically would you like to work on to manage your condition?

How important do you think it is to manage/treat your condition?

What is the most important thing for you to accomplish with your care?

Then just listen………

Markides states, “We don’t have to talk all of the time. When someone tell us her problem we healthcare professionals tend to want to give her a solution or say something to cheer her up because we feel uncomfortable watching her suffering. That’s not always the right thing to do. There are times that we need to learn to say nothing and just listen to the other person.”8

 

 

  1. Martin, L. Communicating with patients. Medline Plus, US. National Library of Medicine. https://medlineplus.gov/ency/patientinstructions/000456.htm review date 11/20/17. Accessed March 1, 2019.
  2. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Ten things that motivational interviewing is not. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 2009; 37, 129-140.
  3. Beagley D, Bonifas R. Motivational interviewing with older adults. Eder care: a resource for interprofessional providers. University of Arizona College of Medicine Tucson; 2016.
  4. Beyond AskMe3. http://www.ihi.org/education/Documents/ProgramMaterials/CDCMillionHeartsBloodPressureProject/BeyondAskMe3.pdf. Accessed March 1, 2019.
  5. Rhoades DR, McFarland KF, Finch WH, Johnson AO. Speaking and interruptions during primary care office visits. Family Medicine.2001;33(7,) 528-32.
  6. Mindful Practice. http://www.ronaldepstein.com/mindful-practice. Accessed March 1, 2019.
  7. The simple powerful question doctors should ask their patients. https://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2018/07/the-simple-powerful-question-doctors-should-ask-their-patients.html. Accessed March 1, 2019.
  8. Markides M. The importance of good communication between patient and health professionals. Journal of Pediatric Hematology Oncology. 2011;33, S123-S125.

Filed Under: AGEC, University of Central Arkansas

Behavioral problems in dementia

UAMS logo

By Priya Priyambada, MD
AGEC Geriatric Fellow
Assistant Professor, College of Medicine Geriatrics
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

 

The elderly population is the fastest growing cohort of people in the United States. The number of Americans 65 and older is approximately 46 million presently but this number is projected to double by 2060, comprising 24% of the U.S. population. As dementia is a disease of elderly people, prevalence of dementia continues to rise with this shift in the population dynamics. According to the Alzheimer’s Association, there were 5.7 million people with dementia in the United States in 2018.

As dementia progresses, in addition to the problems with physical health, behavioral disturbances become more frequent. Studies have shown that up to 80% of the patients with dementia may suffer from behavioral disorders and these continue to worsen with the progression of dementia.

The behavioral disturbances are broadly categorized into mood disorders, psychotic disorders, sleep problems, agitation or aggression and disinhibition. These neuropsychiatric symptoms lead to functional impairment in patients with dementia resulting in premature nursing home placement.

Common mood disorders include anxiety, depression and mania. Depressive symptoms often occur early in dementia when patients still have some insight and are either aware of their decline or have been diagnosed as having dementia. The diagnosis of dementia can be frightening for the patient and symptoms can range from sadness and tearfulness to a total lack of interest in activities and apathy. There may be neglect in self-care activities such as grooming, feeding and reduced socialization. Patients with dementia should be screened for depression and appropriate treatment should be started. Careful attention should be given to the side effects and interactions of anti-depressants with the medications the patient is already taking. Patient can also have irritability and impulsivity leading to agitation and aggressive behavior which can endanger the patients as well as caregivers. In many cases behavioral symptoms can occur concomitantly with evidence of paranoia or delusional thinking or hallucinations which are termed as “psychotic” symptoms. Behavioral symptoms with features of hyperactivity, mood lability, disinhibition and grandiose belief can occur occasionally that resemble manic episodes associated with bipolar affective disorder. When it is unclear if the neuropsychiatric symptoms are related to dementia or when other strategies of non-pharmacological management are needed, a referral to a neuropsychologist is highly recommended. Neuropsychologists can provide counseling for the patient and well as caregivers.

As people age, sleep generally becomes lighter and more fragmented causing frequent arousals and awakenings during the night. Changes in sleep patterns can worsen with dementia leading to insomnia, reversal of sleep awake cycle or hypersomnia. Sleep also becomes more disorganized during acute illness and during hospitalization. Following good sleep hygiene and being physically active during daytime is helpful for a good night’s sleep. Non-sedating medications like melatonin are preferred if pharmacological intervention is required.

Behavioral disturbances can have significant impact on the wellbeing and quality of life of patients and caregivers. The worsening of behavior in individuals with dementia is the leading cause of caregiver stress, repeated hospitalizations, increased utilization of health care facilities, nursing home placements, and ultimately increased economic burden for the family and society. Neuropsychiatric symptoms described above may also be the first indication of dementia even before cognitive decline is recognized.

Although behavioral disturbances can accompany dementia, whenever there is an abrupt change in dementia, it is termed an acute change in mental status or delirium. Delirium can occur in any older adult who is severely ill. However it occurs frequently in patients with dementia even with minor illness and is called delirium superimposed on dementia. Delirium requires rapid clinical evaluation with laboratory tests and often requires hospitalization. A patient with delirium can appear agitated (hyperactive delirium) or quiet and depressed (hypoactive delirium). The common and treatable causes of delirium, both hyperactive or hypoactive, include acute illness like urinary tract infections, respiratory infections, metabolic abnormalities or the side effects of medications. It is important to diagnose delirium and not mistake it for worsening dementia because unlike dementia, delirium is quite reversible with appropriate treatment of the underlying cause.

Some behavioral disturbances are inevitable with worsening of dementia, and measures should be taken to provide education on dementia to family members, close friends, nursing staff, social workers, geriatricians and other healthcare providers and ensure a good support system. As the causes of behavioral disturbances are multifactorial, management should be comprehensive and multidisciplinary. Non-pharmacological interventions should always be used as first-line treatment in the management of behavior symptoms in dementia. The important non-pharmacologic measures are listed below:

  1. Evaluation and treatment of underlying medical conditions: reversible and common causes like pneumonia, urinary tract infections, other systemic infections; fever; dehydration; electrolyte disturbances; thyroid disorders; hypo- and hyperglycemia should always be considered in the evaluation of the behavioral disturbances. Prompt treatment of these conditions is rewarding, can avoid hospitalizations or reduce the length of stay and should always be the priority in the care of people with dementia.
  2. Review of medications: it is very crucial to review medication history in detail. Use of medications that affect the central nervous system and withdrawal from medications with addictive potential can lead to behavioral disturbances. Avoiding medications like benzodiazepines, antihistamines, anticholinergics (atropine, benztropine, scopolamine) and opioids are the cornerstone for the management of behavioral disturbances. It is important to ask and counsel patients and caregivers about alcohol use and over-the-counter medications for insomnia, allergies or cough that might aggravate behavioral issues.
  3. Pain management: pain is an important source of behavioral disturbances in patients with dementia. There should be good balance between adequate pain management and avoiding opioids. Chronic pain should be managed with non-pharmacological measures like physical therapy and with non-opioids like acetaminophen.
  4. Miscellaneous: other nonpharmacological interventions like orientation of day and night with blinds up during the day and lights switched off at night time, minimizing noise and disturbances at night-time, ensuring presence of family member(s) at bedtime as much as possible especially at night time, ensuring adequate sleep at night, avoiding arguments with the patients. Restrains are commonly used specially in hospitals and nursing homes when these patients develop agitation or aggression. However, using restraints is not good practice and the agitation gets worse with restraints and these should be avoided.

The non-pharmacologic therapies like aromatherapy, exercise training, music, art, pet therapy and caregiver education have also demonstrated some benefit for the behavior symptoms.

Pharmacologic treatment of behavioral disturbances in dementia is of limited efficacy. It should be used only after environmental and non-pharmacologic interventions have been implemented and tried.

Anti-dementia medications like cholinesterase inhibitors may have additional benefit for cognition and function and hence can be used for patients with neuropsychiatric symptoms and mild to moderate dementia. Patient with behavior disturbances secondary to Lewy body dementia may also receive benefit from acetylcholinesterase inhibitors.

Antidepressants should be considered in patients with dementia who are experiencing mood symptoms like anxiety, depression, resulting in significant distress or functional impairment. Serotonin receptor uptake inhibitors have been a preferred choice for their favorable adverse-event profiles. Studies have demonstrated the efficacy of sertraline and citalopram versus placebo.

If the non-pharmacological measures are unsuccessful for the neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia, particularly psychosis, and if there is imminent danger to patient or caregiver due to agitation and aggression, antipsychotics might be needed. Both first and second generation antipsychotics have been identified with increased mortality and adverse-events. Evaluation of the cardiac rhythm and electrolytes needs to be performed at the commencement of these medications and at regular intervals thereafter. Therefore these medications should always be used short-term when possible, with regular reassessments of risks and benefits.

In brief, behavioral disturbances in dementia can be quite challenging and the role of education and support cannot be over-emphasized. A multidisplinary approach with geriatric focused healthcare providers, including neuropsychologists, nurse educators, pharmacists and social workers might provide the greatest benefit for the patient and caregiver dyad and improve their quality of life.

 

 

 

References

  1. Alzheimer’s Association, 2018
  2. Eastwood R., Reisberg B. Mood and behaviors. In: Gauthier S, ed. Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Alzheimer’s Disease. London, UK: Martin Dunitz; 1996;XX:175–190
  3. Mega MS, Cummings JL, Fiorello T, Gornbein J. The spectrum of behavioral changes in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 1996 Jan; 46(1):130-5.
  4. Teri L., Borson S., Kiyak A., et al. Behavioral disturbance, cognitive dysfunction and functional skill: prevalence and relationship in Alzheimer’s disease
  1. Geriatrics at your Fingertips, 17th edition, New York, American Geriatric Society 2015

Filed Under: AGEC, UAMS

Melatonin Prophylaxis for Delirium

UAMS logo

by Sathyanand Kumaran, MFSc, MS, PharmD and Lisa Hutchison, PharmD, FCCP, MPH, BCPS, BCGP
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) College of Pharmacy

 

Delirium is a common clinical syndrome characterized by inattention and acute cognitive dysfunction and manifests clinically with a wide range of neuropsychiatric abnormalities. 1 It can occur at any age, but it occurs more commonly in patients who are elderly and have a previously compromised mental status. One of the common features associated with delirium is disturbances of sleep. 2 Disturbances in the sleep-wake cycle observed in delirium include daytime sleepiness, nighttime agitation, and disturbances in sleep continuity. In some cases, complete reversal of the night-day sleep-wake cycle or fragmentation of the circadian sleep-wake pattern can occur. Pharmacological treatment for delirium after non-pharmacologic measures have failed includes antipsychotics such as haloperidol, risperidone, olanzapine and quetiapine. 1 However, the antipsychotic medications have several side effects including prolonged QT intervals, extrapyramidal symptoms, and increased risk of fatal cardiovascular incidents. 3

The pathophysiology of delirium is still unclear. 4 Multiple inflammatory and cholinergic pathways are likely involved and melatonin might play an important role. Melatonin is an important modulator of circadian rhythm, especially sleep-wake cycle. The results from observational studies suggest people with delirium have lower plasma and salivary melatonin than those without delirium. 5,6  Several studies in older adults provide support for use of melatonin in delirium, particularly as prophylaxis to prevent its occurrence.

In a study assessing the role of perioperative melatonin in the prevention and treatment of postoperative delirium after hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia in the elderly, 300 patients over 65 years of age were randomly distributed to one of the four groups. 7 Group 1 was the control and received nothing for sedation. Group 2 received 5 mg melatonin. Group 3 received 7.5 mg midazolam and Group 4 received 100 µg clonidine. These medications were given orally the night before the operation and another dose 90 min before the scheduled time for hip arthroplasty. Patients who developed postoperative delirium received melatonin for three successive days.   The percentage of postoperative delirium in the control group was 32.65% compared to the melatonin group which was 9.43% (p < 0.05). Melatonin was successful in treating 58.06% of patients who demonstrated postoperative delirium (36/62 patients). Overall this study supports melatonin as useful in decreasing postoperative delirium when used preoperatively and in treating postoperative delirium. Some of the weaknesses in this study were exclusion of patients with underlying dementia, severe infections, and acute cardiac events. As a result, the study population is not a true representation of patients who would develop delirium.

Al-Aama et al evaluated low dose melatonin in decreasing delirium. 8 A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study was conducted at an internal medicine service. One hundred and forty patients were randomized to receive either 0.5 mg of melatonin or placebo every night for 14 days or until discharge. The primary outcome was the occurrence of delirium. Melatonin was associated with a lower risk of delirium (12% vs 31%, p = 0.014), with an odds ratio adjusted for dementia and comorbidities of 0.19 (95% CI 0.06 – 0.32).

In a study conducted by de Jonghe et al, 378 patients who were scheduled for acute hip surgery received 3 mg melatonin or placebo for 5 consecutive days. 9 The primary outcome was incidence of delirium within 8 days of admission. No effect of melatonin on the incidence of delirium was observed in the study: 55/186 (29.6%) in the melatonin group versus 49/192 (25.5%) in the placebo group. However, the duration of delirium was lower with melatonin compared to placebo.

In another randomized placebo-controlled trial, ramelteon was associated with lower risk of delirium (3% vs 32%; p = 0.03). 10 Sixty-seven patients were randomly assigned to either ramelteon or placebo every night for 7 days. The primary outcome measure was incidence of delirium.  Although the study showed a lower risk of delirium with ramelteon, the sleep metrics between the two treatments were not different. The investigators mention that melatonin may be preventing delirium by a different pathway other than via sleep. In addition, the study excluded very seriously ill patients and patients with certain types of dementia such as Lewy body dementia.

In a retrospective, observational cohort study evaluating the effectiveness of melatonin for the prevention of intensive care unit delirium, 117 adults who received melatonin for at least 48 hours were compared to a control group of 115 adults. 11 The primary outcome was development of delirium. The development of delirium was significantly lower in the melatonin group: 9 (7.7%) versus 28 (24.3%) patients (p = 0.001).

Although not conclusive, the above studies support use of melatonin prophylaxis in elderly hospitalized patients. However, all the studies had a small population size, the scales for measuring delirium were not uniform, doses of melatonin were different, and exclusion criteria varied from one study to another. It is not clear whether the patients in these randomized controlled studies were treated in the ICU or other units with less aggressive care. Given the fact that the incidence of delirium is as high as 82% in patients in the intensive care, it would be worthwhile to include these patients in the clinical trials. It is not clear whether there is a true benefit with the use of melatonin in all elderly patients admitted to hospitals. Some subgroups of elderly patients might benefit with the use of prophylactic melatonin such as critically ill patients. Interestingly, the studies did not show a difference in sleep parameters between placebo and melatonin which is thought to be the primary effect of melatonin. Larger randomized controlled trials with standard melatonin doses are needed to establish efficacy. However, since the side effects are few and some studies indicate a possible benefit, administering prophylactic melatonin to hospitalized critically ill elderly patients at high risk for development of delirium may be considered.

 

References

  1. Fong TG, Tulebaev SR, Inouye SK. Delirium in elderly adults: diagnosis, prevention and treatment. Nat Rev Neurol. 2009;5(4):210–220. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2009.24.
  2. APA. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). 4th ed Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Press; (2000). p. 553–7
  3. Blaszczyk AT, Hutchison LC. Central nervous system disorders. In: Hutichison LC, Sleeper RB, EDS. Geriatric Pharmacotherapy 2nd ed. American Society of Health System Pharmacists, Bethesda, MD.
  4. Choy SW, Yeoh AC, Lee ZZ, Srikanth V, Moran C. Melatonin and the Prevention and Management of Delirium: A Scoping Study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2018;4:242. Published 2018 Jan 8. doi:10.3389/fmed.2017.00242
  5. Yoshitaka S, Egi M, Morimatsu H, Kanazawa T, Toda Y, Morita K. Perioperative plasma melatonin concentration in postoperative critically ill patients: its association with delirium. J Crit Care. 2013. 28(3):236–42.10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.11.004
  6. Angeles-Castellanos M, Ramirez-Gonzalez F, Ubaldo-Reyes L, Rodriguez-Mayoral O, Escobar C. Loss of melatonin daily rhythmicity is associated with delirium development in hospitalized older adults. Sleep Sci. 2016: 9(4):285–8.10.1016/j.slsci.2016.08.001
  7. Sultan SS. Assessment of role of perioperative melatonin in prevention and treatment of postoperative delirium after hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia in the elderly. Saudi J Anaesth. 2010;4(3):169–173. doi:10.4103/1658-354X.71132
  8. Al-Aama T, Brymer C, Gutmanis I, Woolmore-Goodwin SM,Esbaugh J, Dasgupta M. Melatonin decreases delirium in elderly patients: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011: 26(7):687–694. doi:10.1002/gps.2582
  9. De Jonghe A, van Munster BC, Goslings JC, et al. Effect of melatonin on incidence of delirium among patients with hip fracture: a multicentre, double-blind randomized controlled trial. CMAJ. 2014;186(14):E547–E556. doi:10.1503/cmaj.140495
  10. Hatta K, Kishi Y, Wada K, et al. Preventive Effects of Ramelteon on Delirium: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71(4):397–403. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.3320
  11. Baumgartner L, Lam K, Lai J, Barnett M, Thompson A, Gross K, Morris A. Effectiveness of melatonin for the prevention of intensive care unit delirium. Pharmacotherapy. 2019:39(3) 280-287

 

Filed Under: AGEC, UAMS

From The Director’s Desk

uams logo

By Robin McAtee, PhD, RN, FACHE, Director, Arkansas Geriatric Education Collaborative (AGEC), a Geriatric Workforce Enhancement Program (GWEP) at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) Donald W. Reynolds Institute on Aging (DWR IOA)

 

Happy New Year from all of us at the Arkansas Geriatric Education Collaborative! I hope everyone had a wonderful holiday season and ready to begin a new year.  As we ended 2018, the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) gifted us with the next grant cycle requirements, better known as the NOFO (Notice of Funding Opportunity). Therefore, AGEC staff and partners have been busily putting together the proposal for new programs and activities for the next five year cycle!  We are excited about this opportunity but of course always apprehensive about the uncertainty of grants!  I want to thank each of you who are helping or are contributing to this proposal, it is certainly broad and comprehensive!

Looking back at the last quarter of 2018, we had a very successful 4 day train-the-trainer program on Stanford’s Chronic Pain Self-Management program (CPSMP) where 22 individuals were trained to be lay trainers. They can now go to their perspective audiences and hold CPSMP classes. We also hosted our fall webinar which featured Dr. Rhonda Mattox who presented on Insomnia: a golden opportunity to address psychiatric disorders. Attendance was great (over 75) as were the responses from participants! In November, we also worked with Circle of Life Hospice in northwest AR to provide a 3 day CE Event.  We had 111 attendees and over 1500 total CE hours were awarded! In addition to these programs, we also had partners continue to provide Dementia Experiences, Certified Dementia Classes, Family Caregiver Workshops and a plethora of educational forums.

As we look to this first quarter, we have just sponsored Geriatric Grand Rounds at the end of January with Dr. Brody, from Brain Matters Research with over 120 attendees, and have begun to plan our spring webinars. We are also very excited about our upcoming Opioid Forum in April. An interprofessional team is planning the forum and the presenters will include the AR Drug Director, Kirk Lane; Michael Mancino, MD, UAMS Center for Addiction Services; Teresa Hudson, PharmD; Michael Cassat, MD; Jonathan Goree, MD and Masil George, MD. The audience will be 50-60 older adults and community leaders who are interested in opioid issues and chronic pain in older adults. The agenda includes a panel discussion with experts about: understanding opioid medication, recognizing possible opioid addiction, and chronic pain management. This will be followed by interactive patient simulation experience sessions and a discussion of medical and non-medical treatment options by the experts. We will also provide support for the Geriatric Forum at Hendrix College scheduled in April where experts will discuss needs identified by an older adults needs assessment survey completed earlier in the year. More information will be available on these forums at a later date.

Thank you for all you do for older adults in Arkansas and we look forward to continuing to partner with many of you to expand and improve services and programs.

Filed Under: AGEC

Screening for Dementia

UCA.edu logo

By Kevin Rowell, Ph.D.
Department of Psychology and Counseling, University of Central Arkansas

 

It seemed to Karen that her 78 year-old mother was having more trouble remembering people’s names, recalling the right words to use in a conversation, and driving with some confusion about which routes to take. Karen noted that her mother’s difficulties began occurring gradually over the past two years, and now she wondered if this is a part of normal aging or if it could be signs of Alzheimer’s disease. On two different occasions, Karen addressed her concern with her mother but was met both times with her mother’s refusal to discuss the matter.

Such a scenario is quite common in families, and with the Baby Boomer generation now in their 60’s and 70’s, it is becoming a reality to millions of Americans. When an elderly person begins to experience noticeable decline in memory, sense of direction, and other cognitive abilities, the concern is whether these are due to normal, age-related changes or due to a disease process like Alzheimer’s, the most common type of dementia. Receiving a diagnosis of dementia is certainly troubling and disconcerting, much like a cancer diagnosis, because some forms have no cure and are fatal within a few years of onset. As with most diseases, early detection leads to early intervention which even if not curable, can at least slow down the progression or assist in preserving cognitive function for a longer period of time.

While most of us are familiar with the terms Alzheimer’s disease and dementia, there is some confusion about their meaning. Dementia is a class of disorders that usually occurs after age 60 with abnormal decline in memory being the first symptom to be noticed. Other cognitive deficits include difficulty recalling names of people or objects, carrying out multiple step tasks, solving complex problems, and maintaining visual-spatial accuracy. Alzheimer’s disease is by far the most common type of dementia and represents approximately 60-70% of cases. Other common types include vascular dementia, dementia due to Parkinson’s disease, and Lewy Body dementia (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).

Determining whether or not an elderly family member has dementia usually involves some type of cognitive exam to measure the degree of function that is lost and may also include a brain scan such as a CT scan or MRI to evaluate the brain’s structural changes that have occurred. In both types of examination, the results from the current patient are compared to a large sample of people his or her age to determine if the changes are significantly below average, that is, if these changes are much greater than expected for the patient’s age group.

Cognitive examinations vary in terms of complexity and time: very brief scales have only a few items and take less than five minutes, intermediate tests require 30 minutes to an hour, and more comprehensive neuropsychological assessments involve several hours of testing. The kind of test administered depends upon the health care provider who is seen. Their choice of assessment will be based upon how much time they can allocate for the testing and the kind of assessment training that they have received.

Most people will make an initial appointment with their primary care provider (PCP) rather than with a psychiatrist, neurologist, or psychologist. PCP’s typically have very limited time to conduct an assessment, and they usually receive training on administering brief screening tests instead of more complex scales. If results of the screening test indicate a problem with memory or other kinds of cognitive functioning, the PCP may give a tentative dementia diagnosis but will typically refer the patient for more in-depth assessment by a psychiatrist, neurologist, or psychologist in order to confirm the diagnosis (Yokomizo, Simon, & de Campos Bottino, 2014).

Because of their common medical education and training, psychiatrists and neurologists often provide similar kinds of assessments. These tests usually require approximately 30 minutes to complete and involve several cognitive tasks such as memory, attention span, naming common objects, copying geometric figures, verbal ability, and orientation to time/date, place, and person. Each task is assigned a very limited number of points, usually ranging 0-3, and a total score is derived by summing all of the points. This total score is then compared to a normal range of scores expected for someone with the same age, and in some cases, with similar education. Psychiatrists and neurologists very often refer the patient for a CT scan or MRI which will help determine the specific type of dementia given that the cognitive testing indicates a significant level of impairment and warrants a diagnosis of dementia (Del Sole, Malaspina, & Biasina, 2016; Tsoi, Chan, Hirai, Wong, & Kwok, 2015).

Psychologists who specialize in geriatric assessment, typically receive the greatest amount of training in test administration. Whereas they often utilize the kinds of intermediate tests used by psychiatrists and neurologists, neuropsychologists may want to use more in-depth, more complex tests to precisely evaluate a person’s memory, attention span, and the other cognitive abilities measured in the intermediate tests. Similar to the other tests mentioned, the results are compared to a normative sample to determine the severity of impairment (Fields, Ferman, Boeve, & Smith, 2011).

If a family member begins to experience noticeable memory loss or problems in other kinds of cognitive tasks, it is advisable to seek a cognitive examination because it is critical to have this kind of information in determining whether or not the individual has dementia. These results can then be used to track changes in their cognitive abilities as they age which will be highly useful in determining the optimal type of intervention for them.

 

 

References.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Del Sole, A., Malaspina, S., & Biasina, A. (2016). Magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of neurodegenerative dementias. Functional Neurology, 31, 205-215.

Fields, J. A., Ferman, T. J., Boeve, B. F., & Smith, G. E. (2011). Neuropsychological assessment of patients with dementing illness. Nature Reviews. Neurology, 7, 677-687. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2011.173.

Tsoi, K. F., Chan, J. C., Hirai, H. W., Wong, S. S. & Kwok, T. Y. (2015). Cognitive tests to detect dementia. A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Internal Medicine, 175, 1450-1458. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2152.

Yokomizo, J. E., Simon, S. S., & de Campos Bottino, C. M. (2014). Cognitive screening for dementia in primary care: A systematic review. International Psychogeriatrics, 26, 1783-1804. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214001082.

Filed Under: AGEC, University of Central Arkansas

Tech and Aging

Arkansas State logo

By Jessica Camp, MSN, APRN, AGCNS-BC
College of Nursing & Health Professions, Arkansas State University

 

It appears that more older adults are using technology in their daily lives (Davis, 2019). According to a study by AARP, mobile devices and computers are the primary technology used by this population (Anderson, 2017, p. 3). To a lesser extent, older adults reported managing their healthcare and learning with this technology. Another study by PEW Research Center Older Adults and Technology Use (Smith, 2014) found that:

  • Six in ten seniors now go online
  • Just under half are broadband adopters
  • Younger, higher-income, and more highly educated seniors use the internet and broadband at rates approaching—or even exceeding—the general population
  • Internet use and broadband adoption each drop off dramatically around age 75
  •  27% of older adults use social networking sites such as Facebook, but these users socialize more frequently with others compared with non-SNS users
  • E-readers are as popular as smartphones

Sadly, however, Davis (2019) points out that the design of technology used by older adults rarely focuses on them. This article aims to shed a bit of light on some of the technology that may be useful or even helpful for older adults and technology that is actually designed for the older adult.

Interestingly enough, these are not the only technology-based items, nor services, available to older adults. Currently, there is a multitude of technological products marketed specifically for older adults. Nextavenue contributing write Patricia Corrigan shared an overview on several tech items that can help older adults who serve to maintain their independence, such as:

  • Wearable battery-operated emergency alert systems (such as Philips Lifeline), which detect falls and summon help
  • The Apple watch (Series 4), which monitors your heart rhythm and detects falls
  • Some cell phones (such as GreatCalla), which offer emergency response buttons
  • Voice-controlled devices (such as LifePod), which work with “smart” speakers to remind you when to take your medication or head to a medical appointment
  • Cameras, microphones and motion sensors (Evermind makes one version), which monitor your regular activity — or signal a lack of it to your caregiver (2018, para. 2)Surprising to this author, there is a company offering transportation normally available through the use of technology to older adults. One company provides transportation for older adults by turning traditional on-demand transportation systems (like Uber, for example) already in place into senior-friendly transportation. Older adults can call an eight-hundred-number and press a few buttons once registered, to obtain a ride, and even return home all the while sharing information with the family about their activity through messaging communication. This service charges twenty-seven cents per minute currently in addition to the service rate charged by the transportation company for the travel. Unfortunately, it is not yet available in all parts of Arkansas. However, the zip code 72002 for Little Rock provided the following rates (from their website):
  • Not surprising, there is more than one company that markets cell phones, including smartphones, to our older adults. One such company touts that they are the home of the “original easy-to-use cell phone” (Greatcall, 2019a, para. 1). They also offer a family caregiving device that includes a wearable communicator designed for two-way communication, fall detection, and GPS locating features that are reportedly waterproof. Further, they offer a version of this that tracks fitness and looks similar to the traditional wearable device providing the same features (Greatcall, 2019b). Another company offers more conventional cell phones with some additional services designed for urgent and emergent communication around the clock (Snapfon, 2019, para. 1-3).

Ride Fare:
$3.60 base fare + $0.76 per mile + $0.15 per minute (with a minimum fare of $7.60)

and
Concierge Fee:
$0.27 per minute

* Please note that during periods of high demand, our vendors may include a surge charge (gogograndparent.com, 2018)

Despite older adults still reporting skepticism regarding technology, the trend is up on use for most aspects. This article shows that there is no shortage of new ways technology is being garnered to help out older adults. Let this article encourage you to learn more about how technology can assist your older adult patients, your family or even yourself.

 

 

 

Smith, (2014). PEW report. Older Adults and Technology Use. PEW Research Center. Retrieved on January 14th, 2019 from http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/04/03/older-adults-and-technology-use/

Anderson, M., & Perrin, A. (2017). PEW Report. Technology Use Among Seniors. PEW Research Center. Retrieved on January 14th, 2019 from http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/05/17/technology-use-among-seniors/

Abrahms, S. (2015). 3 Must-have cell phones for seniors. Retrieved on January 17th, 2019 from https://www.forbes.com/sites/nextavenue/2015/06/17/3-must-have-cell-phones-for-seniors/#238490ce6cce

Greatcall. (2019a). About us. Retrieved on January 17th, 2019 from https://www.greatcall.com/about-us

Greatcall. (2019b). Feel safer on the go. Retrieved on January 17, 2019 from https://www.greatcall.com/devices/lively-mobile-medical-alert-system

Snapfon & Excellcious Communications LLC. (2019). Easy to use features. Retrieved on January 17, 2019 from https://www.snapfon.com/big-button-cell-phone/

Snapfon & Excellus Communications LLC. (2019). sosPlus mobile emergency management services. Retrieved on January 17, 2019 from https://www.snapfon.com/sos-plus/

GoGoGrandparent. (2018). How it works. Retrieved on January 17, 2019 from https://gogograndparent.com/

Corrigan, P. (2017). Technology can help us age in place, if we let it. Nextavenue: Where Grown-ups Keep Growing. Retrieved on January 14th, 2019 from   https://www.nextavenue.org/technology-age-in-place/

Anderson, G.O. (2017). Technology Use and Attitudes Among Mid-life and Older Adults. AARP Research.  Retrieved on January 14th, 2019 from https://www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/research/surveys_statistics/technology/info-2018/atom-nov-2017-tech-module.doi.10.26419%252Fres.00210.001.pdf

Filed Under: AGEC, Arkansas State University

It’s not all sunshine and roses: Closing the rehab gap

UAMS logo
By Christopher S. Walter, PT, DPT, PhD
AGEC Geriatric Fellow
Assistant Professor
Department of Physical Therapy
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences – Fayetteville

 

Have you ever considered that your current treatment of drug therapies is not working for you? If you have, you aren’t alone. In fact, the top-ten highest grossing drugs in the United States only benefit 4-33% of the people who take them1.  Unfortunately, research suggests that motor rehabilitation therapies are no different2.

Rehabilitation is the action of restoring someone to health or normal life through therapy after an injury, illness, or disease process. Generally speaking, we know that rehab works.  For example, an individual who gets therapy following an injury (e.g., fractured hip, stroke, etc.) is more likely to improve faster, and to a greater extent, than someone who does not get therapy.  This is good news for those getting therapy and those in the rehab field.  However, a closer, individualized look at the process shows that it’s not all sunshine and roses. Some individuals have very good results after rehabilitation, while others show little to no improvement2.  This problem is made worse by the fact that the rehab clinician (i.e., physical therapist, occupational therapist, and/or other allied healthcare provider) is unable to predict who might or might not respond to therapy.

The problem is clear; the solution is not.  Science has yet to develop a process that predicts who will respond to therapy and who will not respond.  We do know that age is a factor.  The older the patient, the less they respond to the given therapies3-5.

There is good news, though. Just because an individual does not respond to one intervention does not mean he/she will not respond to all interventions.   To put this into perspective, consider the following example.  If a medication prescribed by your doctor to lower your cholesterol does not have the desired effect, your doctor could 1) prescribe a larger dose of that medication, or 2) choose a different drug all together.  The goal to lower cholesterol is the same only the method has changed.   Rehabilitation is no different.

There are steps that rehab therapists and professionals can take to ensure that therapy is successful for as many people as possible. First, our treatments should only be selected after thoughtful examination of the patient’s individual characteristics. Further, it is important that our interventions are evidence based with documented effectiveness.  This is where we need your help. You can help by signing up to be a participant in rehab research trials.  Reach out to the local university to see if there is an open study for people like yourself.  Additionally, ARresearch.org is a secure website that allows the community a first-hand look at the research being conducted at UAMS.  Volunteers can provide their information if interested in participating in research. The researchers are then able to contact potential volunteers for their studies.

The goal of rehabilitation is to restore health and quality of life following an injury. To meet this goal, rehab professionals must work to identify characteristics that separate those who will respond to therapy from those who will not.  With passionate professionals and an enthusiastic community willing to volunteer, we can close the gap on rehab success.

 

 

  1. Schork NJ. Personalized medicine: Time for one-person trials. Nature. 2015;520:609-611.
  2. Winstein C. Translating the Science into Neurorehabilitation Practice: Challenges and Opportunities (The Kenneth Viste, Jr. MD Lecture). American Society of Neurorehabilitation Annual Meeting. Washington, DC.2013.
  3. Dobkin BH, Nadeau SE, Behrman AL, et al. Prediction of responders for outcome measures of locomotor Experience Applied Post Stroke trial. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51:39-50.
  4. Rodeghero JR, Cleland JA, Mintken PE, Cook CE. Risk stratification of patients with shoulder pain seen in physical therapy practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017;23:257-263.
  5. Walter CS, Hengge CR, Lindauer BE, Schaefer SY. Declines in motor transfer following upper extremity task-specific training in older adults. Exp Gerontol. 2018;116:14-19.

Filed Under: AGEC, UAMS

High-Risk Over-the-Counter Medications for Older Adults

UAMS logo

By Katie Cummins, PharmD Candidate 2019 and Lisa Hutchison, PharmD, MPH, BCPS, BCGP, FCCP
Donald W. Reynolds Institute on Aging at UAMS

 

As our patients age, their bodies undergo physiological changes that alter their responses to many drugs. Kidney and liver function decline so that some drugs stay in the body longer or accumulate to dangerous levels. Body composition changes – muscle decreases while the proportion of fat increases – can lead to the need for smaller doses or longer dosing intervals. In addition, older adults are generally more sensitive to many drugs, especially those that affect the central nervous system. Patients are sensitive to both the effects the drugs are designed for as well as their negative side effects.1

Medications that are “potentially inappropriate” for older adults are detailed in the Beers’ Criteria. The Beers’ list is a tool for providers to help identify medications that could be problematic for older patients. It can also be used as a guide for future drug selection. Some of the concerns outlined in the 2015 Beers’ criteria include adverse events like: dizziness, drowsiness, constipation, confusion, bleeding risk, orthostatic hypotension, and delirium.2

However, these side effects are not limited to prescription drugs; the over-the counter (OTC) section of the pharmacy contains medications that may be inappropriate or even dangerous to older adults. Though they may appear to be safer options since they are widely available, they are not without risk for harm. Some of these potentially inappropriate OTC medications are:

  1. Diphenhydramine: also known as Benadryl3
    1. Commonly found in products branded as PM or Nighttime – Tylenol PM, Advil PM, Unisom, ZzzQuil, Delsym Cough+Cold Nighttime, Theraflu Nighttime Severe Cold and Cough
    2. Used as sleep aid or anti-histamine for allergies
    3. Side effects: confusion, drowsiness, dizziness, delirium, dry mouth, constipation
  2. Oxybutynin: also known as Oxytrol for Women4
    1. Topical patch marketed for overactive bladder
    2. Side effects: drowsiness, delirium, dizziness, dry mouth, constipation
  3. Meclizine: also known as Dramamine Less Drowsy, Bonine5
    1. Commonly found in products marketed for motion sickness or vertigo
    2. Side effects: dizziness, drowsiness, dry mouth, constipation, can worsen dementia symptoms
  4. NSAIDs (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs): ibuprofen, naproxen,
    1. Common brand names: Motrin, Advil, Aleve
    2. May increase risk of GI bleeding, cardiac events2
      1. Take extra caution if taking daily aspirin or prescription blood thinners or anti-platelets like warfarin, clopidogrel (Plavix), prasugrel (Effient), apixaban (Eliquis), dabigatran (Pradaxa)
  5. PPIs (proton pump inhibitors): such as omeprazole, lansoprazole
    1. Common brand names: Prilosec, Prevacid
    2. May contribute to bone loss with long-term use which increases fracture risk with a fall
    3. Can increase risk of bacterial C. difficile infections – symptoms include severe diarrhea2

This is not to say that older adults should avoid all OTC products in the community but rather to show that it is important to for providers to ask if they are taking these products. Documenting this information can prevent the need for additional prescriptions to treat side effects that may be caused by an OTC product – halting a prescribing cascade in its tracks.

 

 

References

  1. Hajjar ER, Gray SL, Slattum Jr PW, Hersh LR, Naples JG, Hanlon JT. Geriatrics. In: DiPiro JT, Talbert RL, Yee GC, Matzke GR, Wells BG, Posey L. eds. Pharmacotherapy: A Pathophysiologic Approach, 10e New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; http://accesspharmacy.mhmedical.com/content.aspx bookid=1861&sectionid=146077984. Accessed July 26, 2018.
  2. American Geriatrics Society 2015 Updated Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2015;63(11):2227-2246. doi:10.1111/jgs.13702.
  3. Diphenhydramine. Lexi-Drugs. Lexicomp. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Riverwoods, IL. Available at: http://online.lexi.com. Accessed July 26, 2018.
  4. Oxybutynin. Lexi-Drugs. Lexicomp. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Riverwoods, IL. Available at: http://online.lexi.com. Accessed July 26, 2018.
  5. Meclizine. Lexi-Drugs. Lexicomp. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Riverwoods, IL. Available at: http://online.lexi.com. Accessed July 26, 2018.

Filed Under: AGEC, UAMS

  • «Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • Page 12
  • Page 13
  • Next Page»
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences LogoUniversity of Arkansas for Medical SciencesUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Mailing Address: 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205
Phone: (501) 603-1965
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • Legal Notices

© 2026 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences